For a guy that thinks that everything that is going to Hell for one reason or another. Now I been see a a lot of stories that I seem to think that it's fake. Now I can't prove that I most stories that I see on the net are fake or not. It seems to me that Wall Street Journal seem that they don't care about who they hurt in the long run.
First it was Pewdie Pie for being a NAZI & now they clam that ISIS has ads on there videos. Man talk about damage control to the max. I never thought that a new site like WSJ will stoup to that low of an level. If you think that's bad. Now all channels going suffer. Do to the lack of funds that big companies are pulling their ads that run on YouTube.
I like to see that channels the are starting out on YouTube to be under some kind of screening process in the beginning. Then as big in popularity they do get some kind of funding as they become a bigger name on YouTube. If this was already in place then we will not be so shocked in this story by the WSJ.
Now I know that this my sound like censorship, but hear me out. If the story was true by the WSJ. Then we will never would of been in this mess in the first place. We can learn a lot from the miss steps that we taken in the past, but with the way that YouTube have been in the past with censoring some words that harmless to people.
Now then need to start to focus on the words that can do harm to people. I never been a person to say "That these are the things that we to focus on & not that stuff." I will rarely force people to think the way that I do, because that is wrong to do. We all need a great place to have some fun. There a lot of fun things on YouTube, but there is a few dark places on YouTube that can kill a great & safe place of everyone,
First it was Pewdie Pie for being a NAZI & now they clam that ISIS has ads on there videos. Man talk about damage control to the max. I never thought that a new site like WSJ will stoup to that low of an level. If you think that's bad. Now all channels going suffer. Do to the lack of funds that big companies are pulling their ads that run on YouTube.
I like to see that channels the are starting out on YouTube to be under some kind of screening process in the beginning. Then as big in popularity they do get some kind of funding as they become a bigger name on YouTube. If this was already in place then we will not be so shocked in this story by the WSJ.
Now I know that this my sound like censorship, but hear me out. If the story was true by the WSJ. Then we will never would of been in this mess in the first place. We can learn a lot from the miss steps that we taken in the past, but with the way that YouTube have been in the past with censoring some words that harmless to people.
Now then need to start to focus on the words that can do harm to people. I never been a person to say "That these are the things that we to focus on & not that stuff." I will rarely force people to think the way that I do, because that is wrong to do. We all need a great place to have some fun. There a lot of fun things on YouTube, but there is a few dark places on YouTube that can kill a great & safe place of everyone,
RSS Feed